About Jews Against Obama & JTF.ORG

Jews Against Obama, and JTF.ORG is a pro-American organization that supports Israel. We stand against the political movement, Islam. We follow the teachings of Rabbi Meir Kahane, a righteous Jew. We do not endorse any political party, we only support the party that will build America up.

J.A.O. & JTF.ORG loves righteous non-Jews, Religious and right wing Jews. Please feel free to join our forum as we fight against Marxism and expose Barack Hussein Obama, America’s first Muslim President. www.jtf.org

JTF’s Chaim Ben Pesach is the leader who has been warning America about Obama since 2004.

JTF.ORG is dedicated to the blessed memory of Rabbi Meir Kahane:

147 responses to “About Jews Against Obama & JTF.ORG

  1. what an idiot you are

  2. and? you sound a bit hysterical

  3. Hi,

    I appreciate your concern.

    With all respect, there are some false emails circulating over the internet but I feel that I can give enough evidence to back up my statements.

    Following are a few of the most important points I have to make on this subject of Obama and his church.

    Some Facts about Obama in simple words.
    1. He was born from Muslim blood. (Which in Islam makes him automatically a Muslim)
    2. He was educated in a Muslim school where Christians could not go.
    3. For a better education he attended a Catholic school, which many Muslims do.
    4. He had nothing to do with Christianity until he married his wife.
    5. He joined a cult church, a non-Christian church:

    a) The church teaches separatism (black and white)
    b) They teach black theology, not Christ Theology
    c) The church honors and respects Islam and Muslims to the point they welcome Muslims to be members of the church and gave Louis Farrakhan an award for being the man who will unite the true Christian to the true Muslim to the true Jew. WHAT A CHRISTIAN CHURCH!
    d) Why would Obama leave Islam to join such a church? He joined skillfully to cover-up, knowing that a Muslim in America would have little chance to become a senator or the president.
    e) When you believe in Mohammad you deny Christ.

    6. He never denounced Islam or Mohammad or the Quran.
    7. There is no record that he was baptized.
    8. From his own words, we can judge him, for he made fun of Christianity, the Bible, Old Testament and New Testament, which proves he is not a Christian.
    9. When a Muslim leaves Islam to Christianity, there would be a 100% fatwa (decree for him to be killed) issued against his life:

    a) A Fatwa has never been issued on Obama. But the opposite is true, for the Muslim world is endorsing and supporting him. This includes Louis Farrakkan’s endorsement. Some may say that Obama has distanced himself for his radical minister and from Louis Farrakkan but my response is very simple, it is an act because he, his pastor , and Farrakkan, know if he does not say that. he will lose the vote of the rest of the country.
    b) He was welcomed to Kenya as a Muslim hero recently.
    c) Muslims in America support him, even financially “One dollar for one nation under God” (Allah).
    d) As a senator, he has and continues to employ members of The Nation of Islam. Cynthia K. Miller was the treasurer of His U.S. Senate campaign. Jennifer Mason is Obama’s director of Constituent Services in his U.S. Senate office and is also in charge of selecting Obama’s senate interns. – (debbieschlussel.com)

    10. His agenda for the Whitehouse clearly shows he is Muslim:

    a) Remove our army immediately from the Middle East.
    b) He sits and eats dinner with Muslim jihadist.
    c) Removing the idea of the use of nuclear weapons in any circumstance.
    d) Passing a hate crime bill that will silence anyone who speaks against Islam.

    11. His stance on the issue of gay marriage and abortion proves he is not a Christian.

    Please pass this information around to your friends and endorse me before the media, such as Sean Hannity hannity@foxnews.com , and others whom you feel care about our country.

    Usama Dakdok

    http://www.sonsofapesandpigs.org/

  4. please note: obama called the jews “inflexible” in the peace process. he said “nobody has suffered more than the palestinians”. he said israel should be “non-belligerent”.

    how could any sane jewish person support a man who’s guiding light pastor, spiritual advisor gives the most infamous american antisemite an award saying he “epitomizes greatness”???!!!

    somebody please locate a photo of obama if he attended the gala at the chicago hyatt that awarded farrakhan last year… a photo of him with farrakhan would be the clincher.

  5. Dear Lisa,

    I enjoy your website. I just happened to stumbled upon it while doing research for an op-ed about Obama. I am with you 100%. The man is not to be trusted. When I write my next opinion piece, I’ll link your website within my article. Your group expresses themselves with a great deal of insight, wisdom and extraordinary good old common
    sense. We live in the greatest country in the world. Israel and America are blessed by our God. Keep the faith, and we shall persevere. Thank you for being so gracious.

    Blessings abundant,
    Marie Jon’

    ” Don’t be afraid to see what you see.”
    Ronald Reagan

  6. To call your site “Jews Against Obama” is the most dishonest, misleading and reprehensible thing I’ve heard in a long time. Talk about wolf in sheep’s clothing. A far better thing would be to call your evit site “Against Obama”.

    Be a decent human being and present yourself honestly and accurately instead of in your deceitful manner. If you have an opinion or belief try presenting it in a forthright manner and represent yourself for who you are.

  7. Well Ilene, I am Jewish, and I’m against Obama, as are some other Jews.

  8. “If You’re in the Pew, You Share the View”
    A Jewish Journalist on Obama

    by Aliza Davidovit–jewishworldreview exclusive

    A sentence I once read many years ago came to life before my eyes and ears as I listened to Barak Obama speak about race and Rev. Wright. The sentence read: The making of a great orator is more in his sound than in his sense. Certainly, even those of us “with untrained ears”–Jews, whites, damned Americans–could be seduced by Obama’s oratorical gift and grace. But let’s bust the sound bite bubble and get straight to the sense and nonsense of WHAT was said.

    To start, does this make sense: “Not once in my conversations with [Wright] have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms.” If the reverend is indeed “like family” to Obama, does it fly with you that only at his pulpit before thousands of congregants, who could be anyone from the KKK to reporters, etc., that Wright feels comfortable to speak his mind about race and whites and about damning America, yet in the safe privacy of a conversation with Obama–who is like family to him and also an Obama who was on the rise and had potential to effectuate the “change” Wright preaches about–that only then the reverend would stop to express himself? Hmmm, sound likely? There is not a person among us who has not at one time or another made a racist remark and most comfortably with our closest friends or family, all the while looking over our shoulder to make sure the Jew, the black, the Chasid, the Hispanic, the Muslim didn’t hear us. That this entire logic is spun on its head by Obama is sound bubble number one busted!

    But let’s just pretend by a Disney stretch of the imagination that Obama never knew about the insidious speeches made by his beloved spiritual leader who is like family to him. Well, why didn’t he? If he doesn’t know what’s going on in his own church, then how can we trust he really knows what’s going on anywhere, for instance in such confusing places as Iraq or the West Bank, or America– necessary requirements for a competent commander-in-chief.

    Next, that Obama tries to comfort us with the fact that Wright was ONLY his spiritual teacher is another spin-silken yarn. Nonetheless, that is what should be the most alarming part. If he had been his political advisor, or his academic educator or informational instructor, or some other mentor in the world of facts and figures where logic and rational thinking prevail, I’d say okay, it’s a meeting of the minds. Minds can be changed when new facts reveal themselves–after all we live in the information age. But, it is precisely that this hate-spewing reverend is his spiritual leader who has gripped the presidential candidate by the soul and heart that scares me. Bloody histories have shown that indelible marks are more often made in the heart than the mind. And as Obama himself said, “I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother.” Oh really? Why not, Obama. Remember the old saying “you can pick your friends but not your family.” If he can’t disown him then he has clearly exposed where his heart strings are, and that is not a fraying yarn of silk but rather a much “heartier” tie. One of his aides had to resign for calling Hillary Clinton a monster, yet when his reverend calls to the good Lord to damn America, Obama is not incensed? In his address yesterday Obama distanced himself from the reverend—nice political move—but if he really believes “working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds,” then why didn’t he call to all blacks in that same speech to distance themselves from like sermons across the country.

    Obama’s disability to “disown” anyone, not the blacks, not the whites, not the Reverend, says one thing clearly: He is politically pandering. Seems the only person in the whole country that he can find fault with is Hillary Clinton. An apropos quote comes to mind: A friend to all is a friend to none. This was also seen very clearly a few weeks ago when he failed to boldly say to Farrakhan “Please keep your endorsement and shove it, I don’t want it?” We ask only that you “disown” wrong Obama, don’t pretend we asked for more—and don’t hide behind the high drama of claiming your heritage.

    And finally as a former rabbi’s wife of ten years myself, and as journalist who has interviewed the who’s who of the Jewish world for 19 years, and as a synagogue going Jew, I’m compelled to take on his comment: “I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.” Let me say with authoritative knowledge that there is rare a rabbi in this country and around the world who has not been lambasted, fired or censured by his congregants or his synagogue board for comments made which were deemed unacceptable. Rabbis get flack if their speeches extend five minutes into lunchtime, never mind for their content. Jews take each other on with great vigilance and often little mercy when they feel their own people are doing and saying something wrong. Yes, slavery is an egregious sin committed by white America and against blacks, but let’s not forget the small fact that Jews are the most persecuted people in history and America was certainly not guilt free in its prejudice toward my people. Yet, still in synagogues across this country, Jews say every Sabbath the “Prayer for the Welfare of the Government” (meaning the government of this country, not Israel) and certainly do not curse this country for past grievances. It’s really very simple my friends: If you stay in the pew, you share the view!

    I hope Americans will soon awake from their Obama bedazzlement and pay heed to sense not sound. In addition to all, he has zero experience for the job for which he is applying. Maybe not everyone wants Hillary answering that phone in the middle of the night, but at least—day one–she knows where it is. We already had a president who needed training wheels and this country has spun out of control.

    How much longer will Barak Obama keep seducing lady liberty and whispering sweet nothings in her ear? And if he makes that final seduction on Election Day, America, will you respect yourself in the morning?

    Bio: Aliza Davidovit is a writer, author, journalist and former TV producer with a master’s degree in journalism from Columbia University. She specializes in interviewing and writing about the world’s most famous and influential people for cover stories. She worked at ABC News “20/20″ for six years with Connie Chung and in the ABC News Terrorism/Investigations Unit with John Miller. She was also an associate producer and booker at the Fox News Channel. Davidovit hosts her own popular website: http://www.Davidovit.com . The views expressed herein are entirely her own and do not reflect necessarily the sentiments of any of the publications to which she contributes
    TO BOOK ALIZA: (646) 660-5490

  9. You won’t believe this! Obama is related to George Bush and Winston Churchill! And a bunch of other people!
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080325/ap_on_el_pr/candidates_genealogy

  10. Which opens up the possibility that I am related to Roosevelt. I’m still not voting Barack for President.

  11. It’s just like the moment when Vader turns out to be Luke’s father!

  12. Are you related to Obama too? If not, I don’t see how it’s like that moment.

  13. I don’t think I am but this certainly raises the possibility. I’m still not going to vote for him though.

  14. Just because Winston Churchill was a good leader who would never surrender, doesn’t mean Barack Obama will be. King David was a man after G-d’s own heart, but some of his descendants? Not so much, especially if you consider the possibility that the Royal Houses of Europe are descended from him, and that the Royal House of Ethiopia is descended from him.

  15. Vote here for your presidential candidate: http://www.luckypolls.com/index.php?act=08&id=10234

  16. A sane man on Barack Obama: http://youtube.com/watch?v=OfyHQ2PjLzk

  17. I hate Nazis

    Nazis were a bunch of homos and that’s why they killed Jews.

  18. OBAMA IS SUCH A JEW HATER!

  19. Thanks for having this blog!
    In the mainstream media, telling the truth is usually frowned upon unfortunately.

  20. In case you feel like digging deeper: tucc.org/talking_points.htm
    tucc.org/about.htm
    tucc.org/mission.htm
    That’s the site of Barack’s “church.”
    danielpipes.org/article/5286
    danielpipes.org/article/5354

  21. youtube.com/watch?v=mQpV2sN-FRQ&feature=related
    Does this mean Chaim has an account at metacafe.com?

  22. You are a set of idiots on this site. Jews are supposed to be so educated. What did you do with your parent’s money? Did you smoke it off or buy tons of bagels with it?

    Your parents or grandparents are probably living off of the Meals on Wheels down in Fort Lauderdale and you are here making mischief. Find something more constructive to do with your time.

  23. Dee, just because they don’t support Obama doesn’t mean you have to insult them.

  24. from atlasshrugs2000@typepad.com

    Obama’s Mythical Intelligence

    Much has been written about Obama’s “mythical intelligence” by a media completely in the tank for the boy blunder. His intelligence is , in fact, a myth. Atlas reader Carolyn wrote an excellent piece peeling back the layers of the mendacious narrative to uncover what a lightweight the Soros stooge really is. She describes the unmeritorious means Obama used to achieve his goals – particularly President of the Law Review. When I was in Washington yesterday we were discussing this little mentioned truth – Obama’s year as President produced little worthwhile or significant. Obama’s year is the least cited review. He produced nothing of import.

    The smoke of Obama’s ‘intelligence’ Carolyn

    Obama’s much vaunted intelligence is in reality nothing but smoke and mirrors.

    As nearly everyone has noted lately, Obama’s grasp on facts is being revealed as tenuous at best and embarrassing at worst, as evidenced by his recent gaffe about his uncle having ‘liberated’ Auschwitz when in fact NO American soldier did anything of the kind (in fact – as the quickest glance at a history book will tell you, no American soldier ever set foot in Poland where Auschwitz is located). Now, this kind of lapse could be excused as a typical political mistake, etc. – but in Obama’s case, that excuse can’t be used. It’s not just because this type of typical ‘political’ mistake is what Obama has sworn he’s not – i.e., a typical politician – more to the point, this silly mistake reveals Obama’s ignorance of the bare minimum of historical fact. And such ignorance shakes the very foundation of Obama’s chief qualification for being President – i.e., Obama’s vaunted intelligence. Since everyone acknowledges he lacks experience for the job, the only reason left to support Obama’s claim to the position is because of his intelligence.

    Constant references have been given as to Obama’s near-mythical intelligence – and over and over again, every one claims that the ‘proof’ of that intelligence is the fact that Obama was President of the Harvard Law Review. And that is a staggering achievement. Only the best and the brightest achieve that – only a student at the top of the grade scale, only a student of outstanding writing skills and superb legal acumen is accorded that honor. It is such a high honor that this accomplishment follows that student through to the rest of his life – it is mentioned in his vitae, his honors, indeed in his very obituary as the incontestable proof of his intelligence. Therefore, it is understandable that all doubts of Obama’s intelligence are instantly assuaged by revealing he was President of the Harvard Law Review.

    Assuaged, that is, until one looks a bit closer.

    To begin with, the NY Times 1990 article on Obama being elected President of the Harvard Law Review casts the first troubling clues that all is not what it appears to be.

    “Until the 1970’s the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank. Among these were Elliot L. Richardson, the former Attorney General, and Irwin Griswold, a dean of the Harvard Law School and Solicitor General under Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon.

    That system came under attack in the 1970’s and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition. The new system, disputed when it began, was meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review.”

    There is the Achilles heel. The former high standards which all previous Presidents of the Harvard Law Review had been forced to meet – grades, papers, etc.- no longer existed by the time Obama was elected. Instead, the post was selected on something different than grades, papers, etc. It was selected on race. Obama was the ‘right’ race. He was black. Now of course, that doesn’t mean Obama did NOT have intelligence – but what it makes clear is that by the time he was elected, Presidency of the Review no longer proved he DID. Indeed, at the very moment of his election, the proof of his intelligence was so missing that his predecessor at the job refused to confirm it. Of course, the predecessor trode very cautiously and carefully in his statement issued after Obama had just been elected – but the meaning was clear.:

    “Mr. Obama succeeds Peter Yu, a first-generation Chinese-American, as president of The Law Review. After graduation, Mr. Yu plans to serve as a clerk for Chief Judge Patricia Wald on the of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

    Mr. Yu said Mr. Obama’s election ”was a choice on the merits, but others may read something into it.”

    Mr. Yu’s words are ominous – ‘others may read something into it.” Clearly, Mr. Yu clearly can’t say he’s one of those ‘others’ recognizing ‘merits’ to instead mean ‘race’. After all, Yu sees which way the PC winds are blowing and he certainly doesn’t want them howling in his face by saying Obama got his post for something other than his intelligence. At the same time, however, Yu’s unease at the choice of Obama is telling for what Yu does not say, as for what he does. For instance, Yu does not cite Obama’s grades nor does Yu cite Obama’s legal writings. Yu says nothing about them at all – and the silence is deafening.

    Reading the NY Times further reveals other telltale signs that Obama did not possess the intelligence for that position. As with Mr. Yu’s painfully parsed statement, the signs are noticeable more for what they do not say, than for what they do.

    We begin with a brief explanation of the legal world Obama claims to belong to by reason of his intelligence. That world is defined by 3 inescapable proofs of such intelligence. They are: (1) high grades, (2) prestigious organizations (i.e, the Law Review) and (3) clerkship with a judge.

    We will begin with the first and most obvious sign of intelligence – grades.

    Obama doesn’t have them. Oh, he’s given the aura of possessing them – but when one looks closely at that aura, it disappears like smoke before your eyes. For instance, not once has anyone, ever, at any time, produced those grades. In no publication, either Obama’s or anyone else’s, has any cite been made of that average – was it a 4.0? (Straight A’s?) Was it even higher – 4.3? (A+) (And today’s high school seniors are graduating with 5.0.) Okay, how about a 3.9 or 3.8? No. The answer is none. Never. At no time have Obama’s grades ever been cited. And that is damning. Because as any person who’s ever graduated from elementary, high school or college will tell you, their grade point average is so close to their identity as to be the identity itself. Therefore – for that ‘identity’ to be invisible as is the case with Obama, is quite revealing. In plain words, if someone doesn’t mention a high grade point average, it’s for only one reason – there isn’t a high grade point average.

    (2) prestigious organizations

    Yes, Obama was elected President of the law review. But, as I’ve already cited, this election came when the qualifications of high grades had been eliminated. Therefore one has to look at the other reasons for that election – which necessitates looking at how Obama was elected.

    As the NY Times article cites, “Mr. Obama was elected after a meeting of the review’s 80 editors that convened Sunday and lasted until early this morning, a participant said.” In other words, 80 people got together and in a wearying all night session in which fists were banged on the tables and the air was loud with ‘we have to get a BLACK in this position, it’s 1990, for crissakes and we haven’t got one” – the weary people in the early morning hours, exhausted, worn out and unable, unwilling to fight any longer simply chose the only candidate they could think of to be President of the Review. Obama.

    And if you think I’m laboring too much on the PC reasons for Obama’s election, the NY Times itself describes the vicious political background against which Obama was elected.

    Obamalaw_school

    “…Mr. Obama was the most prominent minority student on a campus shaken by racial politics. A group agitating for greater faculty diversity occupied the dean’s office and sued the school for discrimination; Derrick Bell, a black law professor, resigned over the issue.

    The law review struggled to decide whether affirmative action should factor into the selection of editors, and how much voice to give to critical race theorists, who argued that the legal system was inherently biased against minorities.”

    Well, it is clear the committee choosing the President of the Review did ‘factor in’ affirmative action. And it is just as clear they didn’t factor in his grades. Nor did they cite his papers written. In fact, there was not a mention of either. Instead, the committee abandoned them altogether and went to something completely unrelated – politics. In citing Obama’s qualifications, they pointed out that he had worked the political wards in Chicago before he came to Harvard. You may well ask – what does this have to do with grades or legal acumen? The answer is – nothing. And the answer gets even more troubling when one then realizes that after Obama was elected to President of the Law Review, he wrote no papers. That’s totally unheard of. Writing no papers for the Law Review is like taking a class in gymnastics without even putting on your leotards to work out. The whole reason for existence of the Review is to write a paper. And yet the very President of it writes none.

    (3) clerkship with a judge

    This is a shocking failure of Obama’s that he did not clerk with a judge after graduation. The fact that it is a shocking failure is evidenced by the embarrassed committee admitting it up front so as to beat others to it.:

    “The president of the law review usually goes on to serve as a clerk for a judge on the Federal Court of Appeals for a year, and then as a clerk for an associate justice of the Supreme Court. Mr. Obama said he planned to spend two or three years in private law practice and then return to Chicago to re-enter community work, either in politics or in local organizing.”

    “..usually goes on to serve as a clerk”. This polite sentence means ALL Harvard Law Review presidents serve for judges after graduation. Even Obama’s predecessor, Mr. Yu, did that. Indeed, Yu cited his clerkship with a judge so fast you almost thought it was part of his name. And in a sense, it is. There’s a reason why ALL graduates who clerk with a judge trumpet their clerkships instantly in your face. Clerking with a judge is the sign of a law graduate’s intelligence. Bar none. That’s why it’s on their resumes, why it’s the first thing they talk about in conversation “ah, yes, when I clerked with Judge so and so,” etc. It is so prestigious it’s the first thing other attorneys cite when they discuss that particular person – ‘Ah yes, HE clerked with Judge so and so”, etc. In short, clerkship is the shining golden symbol that this attorney is smart. Why? Because judges do not pick stupid people. Why not? Because the clerks oversee the papers for the judge, help write them, do the bulk of research for them, etc. The judge then stands on that work in reaching his decisions, rendering his judgment. Thus, if the work produced by that clerk is faulty – which it will be if the clerk is stupid – than the judge pays for it with his own career, his own reputation. And of course, no judge will do that. Which is why no judge will hire a stupid clerk.

    Which thus brings us to the unstated but painfully obvious sign of Obama’s lack of intelligence. Despite holding the staggering position of the Harvard Law Review – NO judge, not one, not a single one, offered a clerkship to Obama. It wasn’t because Obama wasn’t free for the asking. As he made clear in his statement upon accepting the position of President of the Review, Obama eagerly made his availability known by declaring that he would be practicing law for ‘two or three’ years after leaving Harvard. I.e., he was open for the clerk’s position. Except – no judge gave it to him. None.

    And Obama painfully admitted he knew this would happen. While other graduates went on to clerkships with judges, the Court of Appeals, even the Supreme Court, etc. or even to prestigious top flight law firms which take only the best of the best, Obama admitted he was not in line for any of that. He would be going for something else. The same ‘something’ which had landed him the title of President of the Harvard Law Review – but not the benefits of such. Once the glitter and glisten of that title had worn off, the bare reality beneath was that Obama was nothing a politically glib individual able to talk well in abstract – but not produce in concrete. And the judges had recognized that fact by refusing to give him a clerkship. The brutally competitive law firms had also recognized that by not giving him a position at their firms. Therefore, there was only one venue open to him – politics. As the NY Times put it, Obama would be returning to Chicago to “re-enter community work, either in politics or in local organizing.”

    Such then is the smoke and mirrors of Obama’s vaunted ‘intelligence’. To this day, he has blown that smoke skillfully in the faces of the liberals to lull them into not asking questions – much the same way the ancient Kings of France blew smoke into the faces of their hunting birds to quieten and lull them into inaction. The terrible problem is that modern bloody birds of prey like Ahmadinijad, Chavez and the Taliban, etc. are not lulled by smoke. To the contrary, these terrorists have mastered the art of blowing their own smoke into the world’s face to lull it into submission and inaction. Such years of mastery means these terrorists will make short shrift of the untested Junior senator from Illinois’s huffing and puffing. Obama’s smoke will be blown back instantly into his face by the hot breath of their hate and insane contempt for human life.

    Which will leave Obama with only his intelligence to defend him – and us. Unfortunately, as the above arguments sadly prove, Obama’s intelligence itself appears to be smoke. Thus leaving us with a potential Commander in Chief able to defend this country with — what?

    For this country’s safety, we must pierce the smoke of Obama’s ‘intelligence’ at the earliest possible moment. If Obama’s smoke of obfuscation obscures long enough to gain him the White House, that fatal smoke could be blown away only to reveal a greater smoke rising from the ruins of America – a deadly smoke which next time will surely dwarf the ghostly clouds which broiled up from the burning buildings and planes on 9/11.

    Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, May 31, 2008 at 12:36 AM in Muslim in the White House? | PerObama’s Mythical Intelligence

    Much has been written about Obama’s “mythical intelligence” by a media completely in the tank for the boy blunder. His intelligence is , in fact, a myth. Atlas reader Carolyn wrote an excellent piece peeling back the layers of the mendacious narrative to uncover what a lightweight the Soros stooge really is. She describes the unmeritorious means Obama used to achieve his goals – particularly President of the Law Review. When I was in Washington yesterday we were discussing this little mentioned truth – Obama’s year as President produced little worthwhile or significant. Obama’s year is the least cited review. He produced nothing of import.

    The smoke of Obama’s ‘intelligence’ Carolyn

    Obama’s much vaunted intelligence is in reality nothing but smoke and mirrors.

    As nearly everyone has noted lately, Obama’s grasp on facts is being revealed as tenuous at best and embarrassing at worst, as evidenced by his recent gaffe about his uncle having ‘liberated’ Auschwitz when in fact NO American soldier did anything of the kind (in fact – as the quickest glance at a history book will tell you, no American soldier ever set foot in Poland where Auschwitz is located). Now, this kind of lapse could be excused as a typical political mistake, etc. – but in Obama’s case, that excuse can’t be used. It’s not just because this type of typical ‘political’ mistake is what Obama has sworn he’s not – i.e., a typical politician – more to the point, this silly mistake reveals Obama’s ignorance of the bare minimum of historical fact. And such ignorance shakes the very foundation of Obama’s chief qualification for being President – i.e., Obama’s vaunted intelligence. Since everyone acknowledges he lacks experience for the job, the only reason left to support Obama’s claim to the position is because of his intelligence.

    Constant references have been given as to Obama’s near-mythical intelligence – and over and over again, every one claims that the ‘proof’ of that intelligence is the fact that Obama was President of the Harvard Law Review. And that is a staggering achievement. Only the best and the brightest achieve that – only a student at the top of the grade scale, only a student of outstanding writing skills and superb legal acumen is accorded that honor. It is such a high honor that this accomplishment follows that student through to the rest of his life – it is mentioned in his vitae, his honors, indeed in his very obituary as the incontestable proof of his intelligence. Therefore, it is understandable that all doubts of Obama’s intelligence are instantly assuaged by revealing he was President of the Harvard Law Review.

    Assuaged, that is, until one looks a bit closer.

    To begin with, the NY Times 1990 article on Obama being elected President of the Harvard Law Review casts the first troubling clues that all is not what it appears to be.

    “Until the 1970’s the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank. Among these were Elliot L. Richardson, the former Attorney General, and Irwin Griswold, a dean of the Harvard Law School and Solicitor General under Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon.

    That system came under attack in the 1970’s and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition. The new system, disputed when it began, was meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review.”

    There is the Achilles heel. The former high standards which all previous Presidents of the Harvard Law Review had been forced to meet – grades, papers, etc.- no longer existed by the time Obama was elected. Instead, the post was selected on something different than grades, papers, etc. It was selected on race. Obama was the ‘right’ race. He was black. Now of course, that doesn’t mean Obama did NOT have intelligence – but what it makes clear is that by the time he was elected, Presidency of the Review no longer proved he DID. Indeed, at the very moment of his election, the proof of his intelligence was so missing that his predecessor at the job refused to confirm it. Of course, the predecessor trode very cautiously and carefully in his statement issued after Obama had just been elected – but the meaning was clear.:

    “Mr. Obama succeeds Peter Yu, a first-generation Chinese-American, as president of The Law Review. After graduation, Mr. Yu plans to serve as a clerk for Chief Judge Patricia Wald on the of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

    Mr. Yu said Mr. Obama’s election ”was a choice on the merits, but others may read something into it.”

    Mr. Yu’s words are ominous – ‘others may read something into it.” Clearly, Mr. Yu clearly can’t say he’s one of those ‘others’ recognizing ‘merits’ to instead mean ‘race’. After all, Yu sees which way the PC winds are blowing and he certainly doesn’t want them howling in his face by saying Obama got his post for something other than his intelligence. At the same time, however, Yu’s unease at the choice of Obama is telling for what Yu does not say, as for what he does. For instance, Yu does not cite Obama’s grades nor does Yu cite Obama’s legal writings. Yu says nothing about them at all – and the silence is deafening.

    Reading the NY Times further reveals other telltale signs that Obama did not possess the intelligence for that position. As with Mr. Yu’s painfully parsed statement, the signs are noticeable more for what they do not say, than for what they do.

    We begin with a brief explanation of the legal world Obama claims to belong to by reason of his intelligence. That world is defined by 3 inescapable proofs of such intelligence. They are: (1) high grades, (2) prestigious organizations (i.e, the Law Review) and (3) clerkship with a judge.

    We will begin with the first and most obvious sign of intelligence – grades.

    Obama doesn’t have them. Oh, he’s given the aura of possessing them – but when one looks closely at that aura, it disappears like smoke before your eyes. For instance, not once has anyone, ever, at any time, produced those grades. In no publication, either Obama’s or anyone else’s, has any cite been made of that average – was it a 4.0? (Straight A’s?) Was it even higher – 4.3? (A+) (And today’s high school seniors are graduating with 5.0.) Okay, how about a 3.9 or 3.8? No. The answer is none. Never. At no time have Obama’s grades ever been cited. And that is damning. Because as any person who’s ever graduated from elementary, high school or college will tell you, their grade point average is so close to their identity as to be the identity itself. Therefore – for that ‘identity’ to be invisible as is the case with Obama, is quite revealing. In plain words, if someone doesn’t mention a high grade point average, it’s for only one reason – there isn’t a high grade point average.

    (2) prestigious organizations

    Yes, Obama was elected President of the law review. But, as I’ve already cited, this election came when the qualifications of high grades had been eliminated. Therefore one has to look at the other reasons for that election – which necessitates looking at how Obama was elected.

    As the NY Times article cites, “Mr. Obama was elected after a meeting of the review’s 80 editors that convened Sunday and lasted until early this morning, a participant said.” In other words, 80 people got together and in a wearying all night session in which fists were banged on the tables and the air was loud with ‘we have to get a BLACK in this position, it’s 1990, for crissakes and we haven’t got one” – the weary people in the early morning hours, exhausted, worn out and unable, unwilling to fight any longer simply chose the only candidate they could think of to be President of the Review. Obama.

    And if you think I’m laboring too much on the PC reasons for Obama’s election, the NY Times itself describes the vicious political background against which Obama was elected.

    Obamalaw_school

    “…Mr. Obama was the most prominent minority student on a campus shaken by racial politics. A group agitating for greater faculty diversity occupied the dean’s office and sued the school for discrimination; Derrick Bell, a black law professor, resigned over the issue.

    The law review struggled to decide whether affirmative action should factor into the selection of editors, and how much voice to give to critical race theorists, who argued that the legal system was inherently biased against minorities.”

    Well, it is clear the committee choosing the President of the Review did ‘factor in’ affirmative action. And it is just as clear they didn’t factor in his grades. Nor did they cite his papers written. In fact, there was not a mention of either. Instead, the committee abandoned them altogether and went to something completely unrelated – politics. In citing Obama’s qualifications, they pointed out that he had worked the political wards in Chicago before he came to Harvard. You may well ask – what does this have to do with grades or legal acumen? The answer is – nothing. And the answer gets even more troubling when one then realizes that after Obama was elected to President of the Law Review, he wrote no papers. That’s totally unheard of. Writing no papers for the Law Review is like taking a class in gymnastics without even putting on your leotards to work out. The whole reason for existence of the Review is to write a paper. And yet the very President of it writes none.

    (3) clerkship with a judge

    This is a shocking failure of Obama’s that he did not clerk with a judge after graduation. The fact that it is a shocking failure is evidenced by the embarrassed committee admitting it up front so as to beat others to it.:

    “The president of the law review usually goes on to serve as a clerk for a judge on the Federal Court of Appeals for a year, and then as a clerk for an associate justice of the Supreme Court. Mr. Obama said he planned to spend two or three years in private law practice and then return to Chicago to re-enter community work, either in politics or in local organizing.”

    “..usually goes on to serve as a clerk”. This polite sentence means ALL Harvard Law Review presidents serve for judges after graduation. Even Obama’s predecessor, Mr. Yu, did that. Indeed, Yu cited his clerkship with a judge so fast you almost thought it was part of his name. And in a sense, it is. There’s a reason why ALL graduates who clerk with a judge trumpet their clerkships instantly in your face. Clerking with a judge is the sign of a law graduate’s intelligence. Bar none. That’s why it’s on their resumes, why it’s the first thing they talk about in conversation “ah, yes, when I clerked with Judge so and so,” etc. It is so prestigious it’s the first thing other attorneys cite when they discuss that particular person – ‘Ah yes, HE clerked with Judge so and so”, etc. In short, clerkship is the shining golden symbol that this attorney is smart. Why? Because judges do not pick stupid people. Why not? Because the clerks oversee the papers for the judge, help write them, do the bulk of research for them, etc. The judge then stands on that work in reaching his decisions, rendering his judgment. Thus, if the work produced by that clerk is faulty – which it will be if the clerk is stupid – than the judge pays for it with his own career, his own reputation. And of course, no judge will do that. Which is why no judge will hire a stupid clerk.

    Which thus brings us to the unstated but painfully obvious sign of Obama’s lack of intelligence. Despite holding the staggering position of the Harvard Law Review – NO judge, not one, not a single one, offered a clerkship to Obama. It wasn’t because Obama wasn’t free for the asking. As he made clear in his statement upon accepting the position of President of the Review, Obama eagerly made his availability known by declaring that he would be practicing law for ‘two or three’ years after leaving Harvard. I.e., he was open for the clerk’s position. Except – no judge gave it to him. None.

    And Obama painfully admitted he knew this would happen. While other graduates went on to clerkships with judges, the Court of Appeals, even the Supreme Court, etc. or even to prestigious top flight law firms which take only the best of the best, Obama admitted he was not in line for any of that. He would be going for something else. The same ‘something’ which had landed him the title of President of the Harvard Law Review – but not the benefits of such. Once the glitter and glisten of that title had worn off, the bare reality beneath was that Obama was nothing a politically glib individual able to talk well in abstract – but not produce in concrete. And the judges had recognized that fact by refusing to give him a clerkship. The brutally competitive law firms had also recognized that by not giving him a position at their firms. Therefore, there was only one venue open to him – politics. As the NY Times put it, Obama would be returning to Chicago to “re-enter community work, either in politics or in local organizing.”

    Such then is the smoke and mirrors of Obama’s vaunted ‘intelligence’. To this day, he has blown that smoke skillfully in the faces of the liberals to lull them into not asking questions – much the same way the ancient Kings of France blew smoke into the faces of their hunting birds to quieten and lull them into inaction. The terrible problem is that modern bloody birds of prey like Ahmadinijad, Chavez and the Taliban, etc. are not lulled by smoke. To the contrary, these terrorists have mastered the art of blowing their own smoke into the world’s face to lull it into submission and inaction. Such years of mastery means these terrorists will make short shrift of the untested Junior senator from Illinois’s huffing and puffing. Obama’s smoke will be blown back instantly into his face by the hot breath of their hate and insane contempt for human life.

    Which will leave Obama with only his intelligence to defend him – and us. Unfortunately, as the above arguments sadly prove, Obama’s intelligence itself appears to be smoke. Thus leaving us with a potential Commander in Chief able to defend this country with — what?

    For this country’s safety, we must pierce the smoke of Obama’s ‘intelligence’ at the earliest possible moment. If Obama’s smoke of obfuscation obscures long enough to gain him the White House, that fatal smoke could be blown away only to reveal a greater smoke rising from the ruins of America – a deadly smoke which next time will surely dwarf the ghostly clouds which broiled up from the burning buildings and planes on 9/11.

    Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, May 31, 2008 at 12:36 AM in Muslim in the White House? | Per

  25. And to cover up his lack of intelligence, his campaign advisers issue formal corrections for his blunders and subtly try to change history when questioned about things their boss has said. But that doesn’t save him when he’s caught in an outright lie, as he was on Memorial Day when he was speaking about Auschwitz (to get the Jewish vote?)

    I did a bit of research, and even with the formal correction changing his story from “uncle” to “great uncle” and “Auschwitz” to “Buchenwald,” the fact remains that his uncle Charles W. Payne was in the Navy, and Buchenwald was liberated by the Army.

    Oops.

    Not to mention that he said the primary reason for leaving his church yesterday was the media harassing its members. It had nothing to do with the rampantly evil comments made by its leadership and the blind agreement by its membership? He’s either lying and did it for political expediency, or this just proves that he does indeed agree with things that people like Rev. Wright say. Fantastic.

  26. This website publishes libelous material akin to the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. The smear campaign you have launched against Obama has been ripped out the textbooks on anti-Semitism practiced throughout Europe over the past two centuries.

    The vast majority of patriotic American Jews will vote for Obama, and not be fooled by the ignorant hysteria and underlying right-wing agenda found on this web site.

  27. wow you guys are such haters. peace man. try to get a life & open your eyes some time huh?

  28. Jeffrey, there’s proof for the stuff on this site, but none for your claims. Dan, I don’t care what race Obama is. I don’t want to vote for anyone backing his agenda. Higher taxes, higher government spending, do you really want all that?

  29. OBAMA KNOWS DIRTY CHICAGO POLITICS

  30. No wonder he’s winning.

  31. I’m a jew and this website, and it’s author are stupid. you’re talking out your ass, and rambling on and fixating on insignificant nonsense. you give jews a bad name, you are prejudice and clearly a lunatic.

  32. Wow. Obamabots are trolling everywhere. Must be awfully afraid of free speech. Particularly when it can be backed by facts.

  33. Can you Obamabots stop it? I know there are people who won’t vote for Obama because he’s black, but these people aren’t those people. My opposition to Obama is because of his ideas, not because of his skin. Look at the person and not his skin. Do you really want Obama in the White House?

  34. Jknight98, they wont stop. This is what they did to Hillary supporters all through the primaries and what they are now trying to do to McCain supporters.
    Why do you think HRC supporters are so outraged?
    Only thing is now we are used to them. Just laugh at them or ignore them or adopt one. Every time they post donate a dollar to McCain. Don’t argue with them, there is no point to arguing. They are here to cause trouble and nothing else.
    I’ll adopt Yoav. :) He is my troll. So c’mon Yoav keep posting McCain needs the money. ;)

  35. I think Yoav definitely needs someone to adopt him/her. How old are these Obamabots, I wonder? I had better grammar than Yoav in middle school. “It’s” is a contraction. The possessive form of “it” is “its.” He/she also needs to capitalize the beginning of his/her sentences. I could go on, but you get the idea.

  36. I’m sorry if that sounded like some lecturing professor, but quite frankly Yoav sounds like he’s still in middle school. :lol: Won’t be seeing him at the polls. :) But then, I’m not old enough to vote either.

  37. Am I really that funny? I’m here all week.
    Quite frankly, I’m here because I’m interested in what shape our country will be in when I’m old enough to vote. It doesn’t look good. :(

  38. It saddens me to know that Jews are this capable of hating the way you have shown. I am a former CC survivor and proud to know that opportunities still exist in this nation for minorities (as we are minorities!!!)regardless of color, creed, or origin. This is a hate smear-campaign you are launching and your ancestors and Jews before you are turning in their graves knowing that they have produced a monster as yourself. Stop the madness and encourage people instead of spreading lies and slander.

  39. Great, more Obamatons! (At least this one can write proper English.) Once again you can oppose Obama based on his ideas and his capability as President, not his race. Don’t vote for or against Obama because of his skin, look at who he is as a person. Do you really want that in the White House?

  40. Oh and this may be of some interest to you: nytimes.com/2008/06/29/us/politics/29hussein.html?_r=4&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1214857904-IJMzl9jTzAPWwTyhmyDqww
    Obama’s supporters have even decided that they want to share his middle name.

  41. wepnet@smp.org

    Who is Doron Braunshtein?

  42. Hi, Nice site. I was wondering if you were interested in reciprocating links. I have already added a link to your site at: http://www.antiobama.net/anti-obama-websites.html

    Thanks.

  43. Dear Anti Obama.net,

    Thanks for writing. I just added you to my blogroll as well.

  44. Come check out my Obama posts. I would be interested in a reciprocal link too. My Obama Posts

  45. I also will NOT vote for obama

    Excellent website

  46. Thank you Jim, and welcome!

  47. i’ve been researching and blogging about obama, islam and jihad for months .. lots here in my blog:

    http://make-informed-decisions.blogspot.com/

  48. You people are unbelievable. As a self-respecting and practicing Jew, your fear-mongering and name-calling makes me sick. Obama may not be a perfect candidate, but “the dangers of an Obama presidency”?? Surely, you must be joking….What about the dangers of another Bush? Are you kidding me? Instead of spreading fear and mistrust, think of it this way: What better sentiment could we send to the Muslim world (which, if you haven’t noticed, has a few gripes against us and our arrogance–and for damn good reason) that to elect a CHRISTIAN president (for he is, indeed, Christian, despite what lascivious tidbits of information you have about his past) that has such strong Islamic ties. If us Jews (and Christians) weren’t so damn afraid of Islam we might be able to confront it in a constructive and meaningful way–ie, thru diplomacy rather than fear and war. Your tactics here on this “website” are as bad and disparaging as any I’ve seen in this presidential campaign–and for that, I’m truly disappointed in our shared heritage as a People.

  49. If you haven’t noticed, we have good reason to be “Islamophobic.”
    Maybe these Koran passages will change your mind: Sura [9.29]: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection. [9.30] And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”
    Sura [5.51]: “O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.”

  50. Aaron, you seem like one of those liberal Jews who would no doubt vote for Yasser Arafat if he had a D next to his name. You’re probably also in favor of creating a fakestinian terror state out of Israel’s guts, so spare me.

    I don’t give a rodent’s posterior about the so-called gripes that these barbarians have against America, considering we send them billions of dollars in oil money. Being President of the United States is not a popularity contest.

  51. Thank you for your site! I was commenting at ABC’s political punch, but I apparently said a “no-no” word that has caused me to be blocked. I have no idea what it was. Those blogs are now overrun with Obama zombies and could use some help!

    I saw the most ridiculous/irritating thing the other day and I’m not quite sure how to deal with it. Anyone see the “Jews for obama” bumper sticker in Hebrew? I did, and I am still throwing up. I cannot stomach that weasel obama. What can we do?

  52. Welcome to my blog, Franconia.

    I’ll try to post here as often as possible. And if you see or hear of anything, please send me links, and I’ll be happy to blog about it.

  53. Jtfdotorg, I’ve heard of something you may like to blog about. Abortion is apparently a Planned-Parenthood conspiracy to kill blacks.
    http://www.jillstanek.com/archives/2008/02/planned_parenth_30.html
    http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eygv8qEkiFE
    This may be why 35% of Americans that abort their children are black (source: wolfpangloss.wordpress.com/2007/12/23/abortion-is-killing-one-out-of-three-black-children-in-the-womb) when only 13.4% of Americans in existence are black. (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_us)
    How this relates to Obama is that he is in fact very pro-abortion. He has opposed an anti-abortion bill that even Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy supported.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3mtiJTkmYg
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AOhvAlMGIs

  54. Jknight, thanks for those links.

    Most people, whether they’re white or African American do not know the real history of Planned Parenthood, or what Margaret Sanger really stood for. You see, Sanger was a eugenicist. Before her organization became “Planned Parenthood,” she published a newsletter called The Birth Control Review, which features articles from many prominent eugenicists. In her book “The Pivot of Civilization,” which you can probably find on the internet, Sanger goes on and on about “feeble minded” people, and how they should not be allowed to reproduce. She compared such people to weeds. So do a web search on “The Pivot of Civilization” and read a few chapters of it.

  55. You’re welcome. I don’t know where I should post other Planned Parenthood expose links, but I found a few more on YouTube.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kqf2lFHXddQ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTI9cWwUO5M
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18IKmx6wsYk

  56. Jnight, why don’t you start your own blog? I’ll be happy to help you, and I’ll blogroll you too.

  57. I’m Jewish, and this website is an embarrassment to Jews everywhere. Pull your heads out of your collective asses and do some research. Obama’s a Christian, but he just happened to go to a Muslim school. You’re not honestly suggesting that all things Muslim are evil, do you? That’s racist. I know many decent Muslims who hate the radicals as much as everybody. But his mother was Christian, and she was the one who raised him. What would you have Obama be, Jewish? That’d be the first time since Sammy Davis Jr. (Joke.)

  58. I am a VERY Anti Obama JEW and here is my blog.
    Best,
    Richard
    http://ohmygodpolitics.blogspot.com/

  59. I am VERY Anti Obama and a JEW.
    Thanks
    Richard

  60. Welcome to my blog Richard. And I’m glad that other Jews see right through Obama. Let’s keep up the fight.

  61. Hello Aaron, and welcome to my blog. I was a big fan of your blog before it got hacked my moosies.

  62. This is the stupidest site…ON THE INTERNET.

  63. Thanks for the kudos. Just kinda strange to see your comment w/o mine.

  64. Hi Aaron,

    It looks like I accidentally deleted it. Sorry. But I did see it.

  65. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Federal-Elections-Commssion/

    Dear Friend: You may wish to sign/post/circulate the above petition concerning a request that the FEC investigate Mr. Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Further information is available at

    http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/08/letter-to-donald-mcgahan-and-federal.html

  66. Shimon Stone

    As the child of holocaust survivors and a retired Marine….if i see one more Jew for Obama I’ll …. Rev Wright set the record straight for this politician …

  67. Welcome to my blog, Shimon!

  68. I am not Jewish, but damn, am I angry. I knew I would never vote for Obama, but I just don’t like him as a person, now. D:< Thank you, my Jewish friends, for opening my eyes even wider.

  69. I read your suggestion about getting a new blog. Does it require any program installations and/or legal contracts? I have never had a site before so I am unsure of the technical/legal requirements.

  70. Welcome to my blog, Cartoon Hero.

    Jknight98, there are free services like Blogger.com and WordPress.com where you can easily sign up for a blog. You don’t have to install any software or purchase a domain name. Just sign up and pick a name for your site. Your blog’s address will then be http://sitename.blogspot.com or http://sitename.wordpress.com. Typepad.com also offers free blog hosting as does Vox. Visit the websites, and you can decide which one you like best.

  71. Okay thanks.

  72. Man of the World

    It amazes me the amount of hate you sick, sick people have in your hearts. You are clearly narrow-minded, afraid, and superstitious. Your belief in a deity that never existed, whose words were fabricated by superstitious old men 2000 years ago – who believed in stoning people to death, and who were pathological, in and of itself is pathological.

    You make anything and anyone not like you your enemy. You would clearly wage war on innocent people because of your ill-guided beliefs. Haven’t you learned anything from the past? Only when you recognize that we are one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all – can you begin to make America great again. And I purposefully omitted the “under god” part because it was added in 1942 by a bunch of right-wing zealots like you.

    Obama is a man who worked hard to get a great education. He married and raised a family, and has done everything by the book. And now you criticize him as if he stole something from you? McCain was a moron (and still is), and got into Annapolis because of his father, was ranked as their fifth-worst student, has been suffering from extreme fits of anger and rage since the 60’s because of his prolonged captivity, rendering him unstable – and who has a penchant for bombing anything and everything, who cheated on his first wife, and told her he wanted a divorce by fax, who is branded a maverick because he’s simply off-kilter, and who choose his running mate based on a 2-hour interview in order to appease the Christian Right Evangelicals… rather than choosing someone with actual talent, intelligence and experience, and whose current wife was addicted to pills, which made her STEAL drugs when she was in her 40’s… and further, he has absolutely no connection to ordinary people whatsoever… tell me, THESE are attributes that are facts… and you still want McCain over OBAMA? You pick a stupid old white guy over a brilliant black Harvard graduate who was raised by his white mother and white grandparents)? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get into Harvard? And then to President of their law Review? It’s hard enough having your articles picked up by the law review in Bum-Fuck State University, let along get to be president of the Harvard Law Review.

    I can see that you would vote for a white conservative kook instead of a African American who tells the truth, wants to help, and is way smarter than anyone of you, or me, and you think you were doing America a service?

    Here’s another fact: the economy has historically done better under Democratic administrations than under Republican administrations. Check it out. It’s true. Read the book UNEQUAL DEMOCRACY or just read the reviews online. The Republicans only became a force in America when Lyndon Jonson pushed equal rights legislation forward. Until then, Republicans were all Democrats because Abraham Lincoln was a Republican who freed the slaves. When Johnson came in, the Dixiecrats were born… and the Republicans eventually walked across the street to join the Republicans along with the Klu Klux Klan. The Falwell decided he wanted power and could deliver Christians as long as his ass was kissed. You’re all a bunch of bigots who can’t change your evil ways… even under the guise of Jesus Christ.

    Interested in your paycheck? Well, I doubt you make more than $250,000 a year. So what exactly are you concerned about? You taxes will go down under Barack Obama. And least we forget, the price of gas went up, up, up under Georgie Boy and Dicky Wicked.

  73. While you can’t prove anything you’ve said about McCain, I would say that we aren’t the evil bigots, Obama is. He voted for a bill that would make it legal to kill babies born after surviving an abortion. He also said that “I have two daughters, and if one of them were to make a mistake, I wouldn’t want them to be punished with a baby!” Besides, McCain tells the truth and wants to help, you can tell he loves this country by the way he talks, and Obama has contradicted himself during the Jeremiah Wright controversy.

  74. LOL what an idiot

    “I can see that you would vote for a white conservative kook instead of a African American”
    LOL! Democrats complain about how Republicans are racist when they themselves are racist! I personally don’t care if Obama is black or white. Obama’s skin color doesn’t change the fact that he’s the most liberal Senator in the Senate (and picked the third most liberal Senator for VP), and that’s why we can’t let him win. It also doesn’t change the fact he’s voted for infanticide, doesn’t have much experience, and is anti Israel and anti-Semitic, and is similar to Hitler in other ways.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXirZLHyFCM
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTp_atr2G9E
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aD0-2CSph_A (Funny, he didn’t like it when McCain picked an ordinary woman for VP)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5w5fcKm_kqk Both Hitler and Obama hate Jews, and yet some Jews support both.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPtjNdSmw0Q Both were able to have multicultural support.
    Another important fact is the Democrats are spewing lies about McCain. It will not be a third Bush term, McCain has voted against his own party in Congress, and I’ve never heard of Bush doing that. Palin also ran against her own party in Alaska to become Governor. Both have worked for reform to reduce corruption. Obama talks about change, but it’s only ear candy, unless he means bad changes.

  75. [...] Obama Lies Again, Maybe We Should Believe Larry Sinclair [...]

  76. If Americans did their research and based their research on the issues at hand and didn’t involve race, ageism, sexism, or religion, they’d know who the better candidate is. If you have to even question what I just said, then you aren’t doing your research.

    The big issue is that we are being screwed over by lobbyists and ppl in the republican party. Also, topics such as taxes, healthcare, the ‘war’ in Iraq, etc. are important issues at stake.

  77. There’s more than that. Democrats will raise taxes, which will hurt the economy. The war in Iraq is real and important, because the radical Muslims call us the big Satan and Israel calls us the little Satan. Democrats also want to legalize infanticide, that was one of the times Obama didn’t vote ‘present’. Democrats also want to legalize same-sex marriage, which will seal America’s doom.

  78. “The war in Iraq is real and important, because the radical Muslims call us the big Satan and Israel calls us the little Satan.”
    Correction: “The war in Iraq is real and important, because the radical Muslims call us the big Satan and they call Israel the little Satan.”

  79. I BELIEVE THAT WITH THE ADVISERS THAT O’BAMA HAS SURROUNDERED HIMSELF WITH THAT ISRAEL IS IN GREAT DANGER DUE TO JIMMY CARTER(THE ONLY PRESIDENT TO BE ANTI SEMINENTIC AND BREZENSKY WHO IS ALSO ANTI SEMITIC.
    HOW CAN ANY CHRISTIAN OR JEW SUPPORT A CANDIDATE WHO HAS AS ADVISER JIM JOHNSON, (FANNIE MAE) REV WRIGHT, FATHER FLAGER, BILL AHERS AND LOUIS FARAKAN.EVEN HEZBOLLAH AND HAMAS SUPPORT THIS SOCIALIST CANDIDATE.DO YOU ACTULLY BELIEVE THAT HE DID NOT SEE THE C D’S OF REV WRIGHT’S SERMONS FOR SALE IN THE ENTRANCE TO THE CHURCH. HOW MANY OF YOU WOULD STAY AT A CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE WHERE A RABBI OR PRIEST SPEWED THIS HATE WEKLY.

  80. Hey jkknight98 u had it right the firts time was that a Freudian slip,the truth shall set you free because I saw Israeli’s supporting Obama so why don’t you guys lol. We know this is really an attack on African American progress rather than the whole Islamic mumboojumbo that u guys claim. You dummies would rather elect an old fart and a rehersed soccer mom/ego maniac/liar/pig in a blanket than see us shine that’s a real problem. All Amerikans who support the unbiased truth really know who to vote for and your little love letters a.k.a blogs will not sway the truth. What do we the Amerikan people gain from being a Iraq. No true Amerikan wants this country to be in debt over a senseless war so why do you and If this was a black run site you would spend your inheritance trying to shut it down claiming it’s racist and Anti-Semetic freedom of speech for your ass.

  81. Shalom Aaron peace is what we need. This will all blow up in your faces if there is another Republican term. You bankers were playing with our tax money now the tables are turning eeh.

  82. Flatzia ben Tuchas

    Chaim ben Pesach,

    Why are you pretending to be a Jew and spouting such shtuyot out of your mouth? We real Jews, who are well educated and not Nazi-racists, do not fall for your nonsense. You and everyone else belonging to or reading your disgusting nonsense should know the facts:

    1. Palin’s church agrees with the views of Jews for Jesus. After a visiting J4J pastor spoke openly about how Israelis deserved to die from terrorist attacks because of G-d’s judgement against them for not accepting Christ, Palin’s minister approved his message and said that the pastor would be welcome back to the church any time. This is well documented in all the news media. Jews should go ahead and vote for Palin if they agree with this perspective of her church. I doubt many do.

    2. Remember that under the regime of Hitler, Jews and blacks alike were to be exterminated. For a Jew to be so bigoted as to condemn a man for his race instead of his words/actions is to stoop to the same level as Hitler. Why should someone care whether Obama were Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Atheist, or an American Indian? Is he not speaking and acting in such a way as to inspire many millions of people of diverse religions to vote for him? Is it not evident that he is a tremendous supporter of Israel when many of his biggest fundraisers are Jews who are stalwart supporters of Israel (albeit not nearly as racist or backwards as Chaim ben Pesach)?

    3. If your name is really Chaim ben Pesach, then my name is Flatzia ben Tuchas. You’re not a Jew, and it’s clear that you are not one, even if you have the rebbe posed behind you. A real Jew would not create a site called Jews Against Obama and then call it Jews for Palin. Even a child knows that we’re voting for the next President, not a Vice President. Go ahead and vote for Palin, but vote her in for PRESIDENT. After four years of an Obama/Biden presidency, we welcome the opportunity for Palin to run at the top of the ticket. I guarantee she won’t even make it past the primary. She wouldn’t have, this time around – especially with Troopergate. McCain spent more time researching the 8 homes he bought and the 13 cars he bought than the 1 VP pick he bought.

    A MAVERICK IS A COW WITHOUT A BRAND
    PALIN IS A PITBULL WITH LIPSTICK
    THEIR CAMPAIGN IS A PIG WITH OR WITHOUT LIPSTICK.

    THEY’RE SELLING YOU AN ANIMAL FARM
    DON’T BUY THE FARM! (McCAIN KNOWS WHAT IT’S LIKE TO BUY THE FARM!)

    VOTE OBAMA/BIDEN ’08!!!

  83. First off, I’m not Chaim. But I’m definitely a Jew, and so is Chaim.

    We Jews have every right to oppose a candidate who we believe will be a disaster for America, Israel and the West. We don’t oppose him for the color of his skin. We oppose him for his evil views, and for the evil America and Jew haters whom he refuses to repudiate. H.is campaign manager may be Jewish. But all his advisors are hostile to Israel

    Also Flatzia, you should really get your facts straight. There were no blacks in Europe during the Holocaust.

  84. jtfdotorg you can not be a Jew, and not know that there were Black people in Germany during the Holocaust let alone Europe, which is a continent not a country. You are obvioulsy not educated. So Jtfdotorg you should get your facts straight. Black people were being murdered and exterminted in Nazi-Germany.We don’t need another four years of ignorance. This is for you to get some truth in your life and get educated.
    The fate of black people from 1933 to 1945 in Nazi Germany and in German-occupied territories ranged from isolation to persecution, sterilization, medical experimentation, incarceration, brutality, and murder. However, there was no systematic program for their elimination as there was for Jews and other groups.

    The use of French colonial troops, some of whom were black, in these occupation forces exacerbated anti-black racism in Germany. Racist propaganda against black soldiers depicted them as rapists of German women and carriers of venereal and other diseases. The children of black soldiers and German women were called “Rhineland Bastards.” The Nazis, at the time a small political movement, viewed them as a threat to the purity of the Germanic race. In Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler charged that “the Jews had brought the Negroes into the Rhineland with the clear aim of ruining the hated white race by the necessarily-resulting bastardization.”

    African German mulatto children were marginalized in German society, isolated socially and economically, and not allowed to attend university. Racial discrimination prohibited them from seeking most jobs, including service in the military. With the Nazi rise to power they became a target of racial and population policy. By 1937, the Gestapo (German secret state police) had secretly rounded up and forcibly sterilized many of them. Some were subjected to medical experiments; others mysteriously “disappeared.”
    Adult African Germans were also victims. Both before and after World War I, many Africans came to Germany as students, artisans, entertainers, former soldiers, or low-level colonial officials, such as tax collectors, who had worked for the imperial colonial government. Hilarius (Lari) Gilges, a dancer by profession, was murdered by the SS in 1933, probably because he was black. Gilges’ German wife later received restitution from a postwar German government for his murder by the Nazis.

    Some African Americans, caught in German-occupied Europe during World War II, also became victims of the Nazi regime. Many, like female jazz artist Valaida Snow, were imprisoned in Axis internment camps for alien nationals. The artist Josef Nassy, living in Belgium, was arrested as an enemy alien and held for seven months in the Beverloo transit camp in German-occupied Belgium. He was later transferred to Germany, where he spent the rest of the war in the Laufen internment camp and its subcamp, Tittmoning, both in Upper Bavaria.

    European and American blacks were also interned in the Nazi concentration camp system. Lionel Romney, a sailor in the U.S. Merchant Marine, was imprisoned in the Mauthausen concentration camp. Jean Marcel Nicolas, a Haitian national, was incarcerated in the Buchenwald and Dora-Mittelbau concentration camps in Germany. Jean Voste, an African Belgian, was incarcerated in the Dachau concentration camp. Bayume Mohamed Hussein from Tanganyika (today Tanzania) died in the Sachsenhausen camp, near Berlin.

    Black prisoners of war faced illegal incarceration and mistreatment at the hands of the Nazis, who did not uphold the regulations imposed by the Geneva Convention (international agreement on the conduct of war and the treatment of wounded and captured

  85. I stand corrected about black people being in Germany and Europe.

    I don’t dispute what you say about blacks being imprisoned, tortured and murdered by the Nazis. I strongly condemn what was done to them.

  86. One more thing, Amerikan08.

    You should know that I’ve gotten plenty of white nationalist/Stormfront trolls on this blog. The thing they all say to me flat out is that they’ll gladly support Obama because they know he’ll be bad for the Jews/Israel. So one thing you should remember is that as much as they say they hate non-whites, they’ll support them if they think Jews will suffer.

  87. They most DEF WILL support obama JTFDOTORG.. that is their total agenda- hatred for Jewish people, thats all, SOS- different century, different asinine people.

  88. “We know this is really an attack on African American progress rather than the whole Islamic mumboojumbo that u guys claim.”

    By that logic, all attacks on Clarence Thomas are also attacks on African American progress. And to those of you who think opposition to Obama all about race, consider that voting for someone because he’s black is just as racist as voting against him or her for the same reason. Personally, my problem isn’t the color of Obama’s skin, but what he’s said and done. If Biden were running for President, I wouldn’t vote for him no matter what the color of his VP was. Furthermore, I could support Alan Keyes or Condoleeza Rice for the Presidency. When is the truth finally going to set people free? When are they finally going to get it? When will they finally understand McCain’s the lesser of two evils?

  89. Rick Davis, Freddie Mac when will your lying leaders give it up. WOW I know McCain forgot to mention that. Won’t you guys help the old man out, he’s scared to debate Obama. He’s pleading with Obama to give him more time to get his lies straight.Im sorry he’s suffering from Alzheimers and forgot. I would be afraid to leave the country in his hands what else might he forget. Palin’s still learning the names of international leaders. What happened to freedom of press? She’s scared of being interviewed by the reporters. Who wants a VP who’s scared to talk? Soooooo unexperienced.

    This is for those who pick my words apart the Grand Old Party does not represent black progression. Clarence Thomas was just an Affirmative Action pawn. He and his actions remind me of scene’s straight out of “Birth Of A Nation”, and if you think that is progression that is truly sad.

  90. Campaign suspended..McCain hanging onto Bush once again..How is it possible to cancel a campaign 40 days before an Election? Palin hasn’t entertained us yet. I understand it’s hard for older angry people to multi task. Wow Obama has beat McCain in all of the people’s poll. The people are very smart.

  91. “Won’t you guys help the old man out, he’s scared to debate Obama.”

    Haven’t you heard about Saddleback? Well, that was more like separate interviews, but McCain did better.

    “This is for those who pick my words apart the Grand Old Party does not represent black progression.”

    Funny, the Democratic Party was aligned with the KKK for a period of time, because the Republican Party freed the slaves.

    “Clarence Thomas was just an Affirmative Action pawn. He and his actions remind me of scene’s straight out of “Birth Of A Nation”, and if you think that is progression that is truly sad.”

    Wow…and when a liberal black is running for President, he’s not an Affirmative Action pawn? Interesting double standard you hold. As for Birth of A Nation, it kind of is like that. The Democratic Party (KKK in the movie) smear (lynch in the movie) Clarence Thomas (Gus in the movie). You’re right, that’s not progression, but the Democratic Party is the one stopping it in this case. Also, keep in mind the Democratic Party is the one that’s pro-abortion, and:

    Number of blacks killed by lynching in the U.S. between 1900 and 1959:
    1,795 (30 per year).
    Number of black babies killed by abortion between 1973 and 2008:
    15,148,000 (currently 574,000 per year)
    Ratio of black babies killed by abortion to blacks killed by lynching:
    8,440 to 1.

    “Campaign suspended..McCain hanging onto Bush once again”

    McCain is trying to deal with the economic crisis.

  92. Also, this may interest you:

  93. Are you serious, I know History and The Emancipation Proclamation was no humanitarian effort. That was all about crushing the South’s socioeconomic standing. It’s clah with the Union, You know cotton made alot of money internationally making slavery very very profitable for southern plantation owners.If we should be so thankful to the Republicans for freeing us what they heck happened during Reconstruction. Sharecropping Slavery # 2

    If you know anything about abortions you would know that a Roman Catholic Republican named Margaret Higgins Sanger created Planned Parenthood and was secretly performing eugenics and euthanasia on blacks just like the Nazi’s did Blacks in Germany during the Holocaust and where are 90% of these abortions that you speak of take place you got it Planned Parenthood.
    All of these pro choice Republicans lets not get started Rudy Giuliani.
    Read Freakonomics please.

    I want a commander in chief that can multi task McCain can’t resolve this economic crisis anyway unless he and the Republican party created it. I saw the Protestors on Saturday on CNN and the McCain campaign paid them $20 each. How is it possible that Obama hates himself and his family by being supported by the KKK so he hates blacks and Jews give me a break.

    It’s funny how you chose to use lyching numbers after it’s popularity had gone after the bill was passed to stop it. Give me the number of blacks lynced from 1860 to 1950 I bet your calculations will be alot different. I will never be a Republican, because of Reagan 1 and 2 mainly, because of Reaganomics. Bush 1,2, and 3 and Bushanomics and the possible threat of McCain another horrible Republican.

    So do you support your President’s current bailout proposal? If you do I would like to come hang with you on your planet, because it’s surely not earth.

  94. Actually, Amerikan08, that eugenicist Margaret Sanger was an avowed Socialist:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

    <blockquoteSanger was also an avowed socialist, blaming the evils of contemporary capitalism for the unsatisfactory conditions of the young white working-class women. Her very personal views on this issue are evident in the last pages of What Every Girl Should Know.

    Here’s more:

    http://www.answers.com/topic/margaret-sanger

    Margaret Sanger’s experiences with slum mothers who begged for information about how to avoid more pregnancies transformed her into a social radical. She joined the Socialist party, began attending radical rallies, and read everything she could about birth control practices. She became convinced that oversized families were the basic cause of poverty. In 1913 she began publishing a monthly newspaper, the Woman Rebel, in which she passionately urged family limitation and first used the term “birth control.” After only six issues, she was arrested and indicted for distributing “obscene” literature through the mails. She fled to Europe, where she continued her birth control studies, visiting clinics and talking with medical researchers.

    And there’s even more here:

    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1816

    In 1912 Sanger and her family settled in New York City. She became a member of both the Women’s Committee and the Marxist Committee of the New York Socialist Party. “Our living-room,” she would write in her 1938 autobiography, “became a gathering place where liberals, anarchists, Socialists and I.W.W.’s [Industrial Workers of the World members] could meet.”

  95. “Sharecropping Slavery # 2″

    Yes, there was Sharecropping. But what makes you think Republicans intended for that to happen? Maybe slavery just has a tendency to be replaced by serfdom. Serfdom was created in Europe when it became illegal to enslave Christians, who were the majority of the population at the time.

    “If you know anything about abortions you would know that a Roman Catholic Republican named Margaret Higgins Sanger created Planned Parenthood and was secretly performing eugenics and euthanasia on blacks just like the Nazi’s did Blacks in Germany during the Holocaust and where are 90% of these abortions that you speak of take place you got it Planned Parenthood.
    All of these pro choice Republicans lets not get started Rudy Giuliani.”
    Funny, the Democrats are with Planned Parenthood. They support abortion. Plus, I know Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood, and that she’s not a Republican, most Republicans are pro-life. Furthermore, Obama is the pro-“choice” (should be pro-death) candidate here. He even thinks that if a baby survives an abortion, it should still die.
    “I will never be a Republican, because of Reagan 1 and 2 mainly, because of Reaganomics.”
    Yes, Bushanomics weren’t any good. But Reaganomics helped because lower taxes actually improved our economy.

  96. This is not at all surprising as Margaret Sanger, who founded Planned Parenthood, always thought of elective abortion as a way to limit the number of “inferior” people – especially black people. Not at all shocked to find that PP honors its founder by keeping up the racist end of abortion.

    You can not dispute the fact that she voted as a Republican! The truth is the truth.

    Wow I rest my case with you. You are rasist! , to post

    Margaret Sanger’s experiences with slum mothers who begged for information about how to avoid more pregnancies transformed her into a social radical. She joined the Socialist party, began attending radical rallies, and read everything she could about birth control practices. She became convinced that oversized families were the basic cause of poverty. In 1913 she began publishing a monthly newspaper, the Woman Rebel, in which she passionately urged family limitation and first used the term “birth control.” After only six issues, she was arrested and indicted for distributing “obscene” literature through the mails. She fled to Europe, where she continued her birth control studies, visiting clinics and talking with medical researchers.

    Sounds like the same Nazi reasoning she gave in the early 1900’s you have to stop going to these Klan-Nazi sites to get your information. I see that you don’t have any prior knowledge about these issue’s and your choice of quotes makes that quit obvious, like I don’t know who she was and what she stood for. Did you know she was an honorary member of the women’s chapter of the KKK. She and her Nazi comrades (really do some research please ) were performing genocide. Performing operations to steralize black women who she felt was inferior and were creating more inferior beings. She was performing what she considered ethnic cleansing.

    Eugenics is a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention.[2] Throughout history, eugenics has been regarded by its various advocates as a social responsibility, an altruistic stance of a society, meant to create healthier, stronger and/or more intelligent people, to save resources, and lessen human suffering.

    Earlier proposed means of achieving these goals focused on selective breeding, while modern ones focus on prenatal testing, genetic counseling, birth control, in vitro fertilization, and genetic engineering. Opponents argue that eugenics is immoral. Historically, a minority of eugenics advocates have used it as a justification for state-sponsored discrimination, forced sterilization of persons deemed genetically defective, and the killing of institutionalized populations. Eugenics was also used to rationalize certain aspects of the Holocaust.

    I thought besides the differences in our Politics, you made for good debate, but not any more by posting that racist stuff. You can not possibly be a Jew and defend the practices such as Eugenics and Euthanasia that killed our people during the Holocaust and blacks in the U.S. Therfore, I don’t believe you are a Jew at all your knowledge is not vast. We are suposed to be the Educated, but what happened with you. I made you show me your true intent. Slavery serfdom what the hell. Republicans always replace something for it right? The American public are the slaves we are losing our homes, losing our retirments, losing our savings,losing our insurance, and to top it off we have to pay for being ripped off.

    Under the current regime whe are suposed to bail these crooks out who have been ripping the American people off for years. Looks alot like the Early 1900’s when blacks cultivated there own land but were in debt to the old Plaintation owner, who sold him everything. We are gettiing duped like that.

    Just a side bar, we heard Palin speak and she said she agrees with the Bush administration and believes that we should keep taking the War to them.
    We are in serious trouble.

    I can deal with Republican’s but not racist sorry.

  97. Amerikan08, you need to re-read what I wrote.

    All I’m trying to get across is that Sanger was a socialist, not a Republican. That is why I put up those quotes. And those sites I linked to were not racist in any way.

    We all agree that she was a eugenicist. But you seem to think that eugenicists are automatically Republicans/conservatives, which is not the case.

  98. Also, Amerikan08, this whole financial crisis is because of liberal Democrats forcing lending institutions to lower their standards, and extend loans to people who clearly had no way of repaying what they borrowed.

  99. “You can not dispute the fact that she voted as a Republican!”
    She did? Then why are the Democrats the ones who promote her pro-“choice” policies?
    “You are rasist!”
    First off, I don’t hate all black people, or any race, so I’m not racist. Second, keep in mind that this is a Jewish site, and I am half-Asian. We are also victims of racism.
    “Sounds like the same Nazi reasoning she gave in the early 1900’s you have to stop going to these Klan-Nazi sites to get your information.”
    Here you make an accusation that has no proof. You’re not proving anything, just ticking people off.
    “Did you know she was an honorary member of the women’s chapter of the KKK. She and her Nazi comrades (really do some research please ) were performing genocide. Performing operations to steralize black women who she felt was inferior and were creating more inferior beings. She was performing what she considered ethnic cleansing.”
    It wouldn’t surprise me if she was. But that doesn’t mean you should vote Democrat. Au contraire, it means you should vote for the pro-life candidate.
    “I thought besides the differences in our Politics, you made for good debate, but not any more by posting that racist stuff. You can not possibly be a Jew and defend the practices such as Eugenics and Euthanasia that killed our people during the Holocaust and blacks in the U.S.”
    When did I post anything racist? Anyways, I never defended abortion, or other forms of eugenics. I am a conservative; that means I’m opposed to abortion.
    “Opponents argue that eugenics is immoral.”
    It is immoral. I don’t see how you connect Republicans to that.
    “Republicans always replace something for it right?”
    I wasn’t saying that Republicans intended to make black people peasants. I’m just theorizing that is the social effect of banning slavery.
    “The American public are the slaves we are losing our homes, losing our retirments, losing our savings,losing our insurance, and to top it off we have to pay for being ripped off.”
    If you’re referring to 401ks forcing people to stay at their job (so they don’t lose all that hard-earned cash) I don’t think the Democrats have done anything to change that. As for the loss of retirements, savings, insurance, and whatnot, slaves don’t have that in the first place.

  100. Anyway, blacks alone shouldn’t be the only progress we’re focusing on. What about mixed children? Certainly, the Democratic Party is raising hell to prevent the progress of their parents (interracial couples.) Why, just google Mitch McConnell and Elaine Chao and how they’ve been smeared. Not so different from the way Clarence Thomas and Sarah Palin have been lied about by those libtards. The DemoKKKratic party leadership says it’s for tolerance but all they tolerate are those that agree with them. :roll:

  101. Why Obama Will Lose Video:

    Enjoy, and help us get the word out there on your blogs and message boards.

  102. On your blogroll you have No Compromise listed. I believe she has a blog radio show every Thursday. Has anyone from this site been on as a guest? If so, what date? If not, that would be a great way to spread the message when time to election day is running out!

  103. How true! As a “neo-con” Jew, I’ve butted heads due to my staunch pro-Israel and realpolitik views: I refuse Obama’s Kool-Aid! The “hip” Liberal Jews harbor antipathy towards an unapologetic strike-first Israel, favoring the Old Europe Socialist appeasement ways and fawning to wannabe intellectual Hollywood. A good read is “USEFUL IDIOTS” by Mona Charen and also “SELF-HATING JEWS AND THE JEWISH STATE” by Ben Shapiro. Liberal Jews should heed the words of Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin: “We fight, therefore we are” and not the venom of self-hating Jew Noam Chomsky.

  104. Welcome to my blog, PalinYid. The book about self-hating Jews sounds very interesting. Ben Shapiro is great.

  105. Last update – 12:05 22/10/2008
    Top Iran officials recommend preemptive strike against Israel
    By Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondent
    Tags: Israel news, nuclear, Iran

    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1030279.html

  106. I enjoyed this site tremendously. For a moment I even took it seriously. Nice satire. Very subtle. Keep it up.

  107. hello it is test. WinRAR provides the full RAR and ZIP file support, can decompress CAB, GZIP, ACE and other archive formats.
    strllxpacwlybwdalmzkhzajkuofwqaepoqhello

  108. Hey. We think your blog is an interesting read.

    Check us out if you wish: http://gunblog.wordpress.com/

  109. Thank you for writing to me, Heather. Your blog is also an interesting read. I’ll add you to my blogroll shortly.

  110. G-d bless Israel and America!

  111. Obama is surrounded by Jewish politicians: Axelrod, Rahm etc. His cousin is a black Rabbi. I think you just talking nonsense to make anti-zionists believe that Obama is bad for Israel and win their support.

    Oboma is not against Israel UNFORTUNATELY. He did not criticize Israel’s pointless and immoral war in Gaza. Obama is a typical pro Zionist puppet on a long leash.

    You know why Zionists will not succeed!: becaause Zionism is a secular invention of people who do not read the TORAH! You Zionist nut-cases gotta get your heads out of your asses and start realizing that just like Jacob Klatzkin and the kind in the early 20th century you are fostering hostility, death and destruction to us and the rest of the world.

    We need a quick and peaceful end of Israel’s existence, and resettlea the Jews in Europe and the US with the formula of Rabbi Samson Hirsch:

    “Thus, Jews are enjoined to perform a most precarious balancing act. On the one hand there is the obligation to act in an honest, empathetic, loyal and patriotic manner towards the nation in which they dwell. This obligation extends to Jewish relations with all peoples living within the nation. On the other hand, there is a need for spiritual and to some extent social isolation in order to practice the Torah and preserve Jewish survival. Inclining too far to either side of this dichotomy can result in much evil and confusion. In the proper balance, though, lies the fulfillment of Jewish destiny. And, combined with the yearning for the Messiah, it is the only recipe for the world’s salvation. ”

  112. Dave, you seriously need your head examined.

  113. Dave, you would not know a Jewish concept if you tripped over one.

  114. All Jews who read the Torah realize that Hashem gave us the Mitzvah to inhabit the land of Israel. There are numerous Mitzvot which can only be done when the Jewish people, all of Klal Yisroel, inhabit the holy land. I don’t know what kind of Jew you are but I feel sad for people who don’t have a fire burning in their sole for the restoration of the Jewish nation in our promised land. Zionism is integral to Jewish observance and we say “Next year in Jerusalem” every Pesach.

    Do you think the Jewish people cared about what the world thought when Moses went to Pharoah and said “Let my people go”? Do you think that they worried what the nations will think? No, Hashem made us a promise and he kept his word, for Hashem is righteous.

    All Jews should live in Israel as Hashem has commanded. Some of us are stuck in Galut because of family issues and will make Aliyah as soon as their responsibilities in Galut are satisfied. I know I will lay my bones down in Tzfat, G-d Willing.

    Blessed are those who Bless all of Israel, Cursed are those who curse Israel.

  115. http://www.torah.org/learning/beyond-pshat/5765/behar.html

    Parshas Behar

    1. The Gift of the Land of Israel

    The Torah tells us that during the Sabbatical year (seventh year) the Land must remain fallow. All agricultural activity must come to a halt. During the seventh year of the Sabbatical Cycle, one is not permitted to exercise any degree of ownership rights over the land. It must remain in an ownerless state regarding the produce of the seventh year. On the fiftieth year, which is the Jubilee year (Yovel), all properties that were sold during the seven Sabbatical Cycles of seven years, must revert back to their original owners. The Torah states as a negative commandment, “The land may not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is Mine (G’d); for you are sojourners and residents with Me.” Because the Jew is only a resident and not an owner of the Land, he has no right to exercise full ownership rights.

    The Torah tells us that despite the financial and labor investment of an owner in his land, he has no right to withhold anyone from partaking of its produce every Sabbatical year (every seven years). In effect, he is only leasing the land with certain stipulations set forth in the Torah. All produce in the Land of Israel is subject to numerous tithes – to the Kohen, the Levy, the poor and other times one must take 10% and consume it in Jerusalem. The many laws that pertain to the produce of Israel are a continuous reminder that one is only a beneficiary of its bounty when one abides by the stipulations of the true owner who is G’d. Thus, when one lives in Israel, especially within an agricultural context, one is able to maintain a continuous cognizance of G’d’s dominion.

    When the Jewish people failed and believed that their success was attributable to themselves, they violated 70 Sabbatical years. Because of this disregard, the Jewish people were displaced (exiled) to Babylon for a period of 70 years.

    King David states in Tehillim (Psalms), “As for the heavens- heavens are Hashem’s, but the earth He has given to mankind…” Sforno explains that the words of King David are referring to the world at large and not the Land of Israel. The earth was given to the nations of the world but the Land of Israel/ the holy land was designated for the Jewish people to be there only to observe the Torah.

    Maharal of Prague explains that each of the 70 root nations received a location in the world that is suited for its own level of spirituality. For example, the prophet Yechezkel refers to the Egyptian people as “donkeys” (chamor). He states, “Their flesh is the flesh of donkeys.” Maharal explains that the word “chamor” (donkey) is derived from “chomer” which means material. Of all the 70 nations of the world, the Egyptian people have the least relevance to spirituality. Thus, the land of Egypt was the most appropriate location for them since it was a location devoid of spirituality.

    In contrast, the Land of Israel is the holy land – thus it is suited for the Jewish people who are a holy people. Since this is the reality of the Jew, G’d does not want him to forget that his existence is only a means and not an end. The Gemara in Tractate Berachos explains that what King David states in Psalms, “…the heaven is for G’d and the earth was given to mankind” is true only after manacknowledges that G’d is the Creator of the earthly existence. This acknowledgement comes about through the recitation of blessings. The Rabbis enacted the recitation of a blessing before partaking of a food item or experiencing other benefits in order for one to be continuously cognizant that man is only a beneficiary of G’d’s Goodness. As the Torah states after recognizing “the land is for Me (G’d) you will dwell in the land securely.” Only after one recognizes that all emanates from Him, is one truly secure.

  116. Dave,

    Since you are with the Muslims against the troops, and are indeed a TRAITOR, get use to the WORDS OF allah:

    Bukhari: V2B24N555

    “I heard the Prophet say, ‘Allah hates for you for asking too many questions.’”

  117. spiritus_persona

    You Jews who are against your own people and your own homeland had better wake up really soon! You had better learn that America is not a safe haven for the Jews! You antisemite Jews don’t realize that without a Jewish Homeland you would still be in exile left at the mercy of your host nation!

  118. Awesome info! I was honestly just thinking about something similar to this the other day so, it was almost weird when I ran across this. You would be surprised how many people simply have no idea when it comes to this kind of stuff. Anyway, thanks for getting this info out there and Im sure Im not the only one who appreciates you taking the time to post this for the masses.

  119. You’re a bunch of sick racist KKK motherfuckers!

  120. America is not safe for any faith other than the Muslim extremist religion.

    Very chilling…
    http://www.islamoncapitolhill.com/

  121. Interesting link, TxLady. Thanks for sharing.

  122. This is a repulsive website! Jews and Muslims ARE not enemies; if you believe that, you are either Jews who know nothing about Judaism or you are anti-Semites.

    The fact that you would also refer to righteous gentiles, a Holocaust term, shows how sick you are!

    Obama is not an enemy of Israel or Jews. The enemy are people like you; KKK extremists who are utterly without morality and intellect!!!!

  123. maxcade, you are a traitor to Judaism if you believe any of the repulsive racism on this blog! If you believe that Muslims are an enemy of Jews, then you are a psychopath who needs your head examined. You are the real traitor. Here’s a hint you repulsive extremist, REAL Jews are not enemies of Muslims, then again, oyou are not a real Jew. You are simply a psychopath who calls yourself Jewish.

    You are all psychopaths; extremists who are doing more damage to Jews and Israel than any non-Jewish anti-semitie. I say non-Jewish, because you are ALL anti-semites. You are abominations.

    spiritus_persona, the true antisemite Jews are people like you; fake Jews who are against real Jews and against Israel. You aren’t a real Jew; you are no more a real Jew than any anti-semite. You are disgusting, and you are a disgrace. Jews who support Obama and are opposed to racism are better Jews than you could ever be. You are nothing but a filthy little child who is so anti-semitic that you should join the Nazi party. They would love you.

    TxLady, you filty racist, the only extremists are people like you. What is truly chilling is that you are not in prison where you belong. Islam is a beautiful religion, and if you are Christian, then you an Islamophobic/anti-Semitic KKK racist. If you are Jewish, you are an Islamophobiv/self-hating Jewish KKK racist. You are without any benefit to the world. If you die, if any of you die, nobody would die. You are all completely and totally Islamophobic and anti-Semitic and are complete psychopaths. To quote Joe America, you are all a bunch of sick racist KKK motherfuckers!

  124. Correction; If you die, if any of you die, nobody would care. In fact, people would celebrate!

  125. It’s people like you that do more damage to Judaism, Israel and humanity than anyone else. You fucking piece of shits!

  126. Dan, who made you the judge of whether a person is a “real” Jew?

  127. jtfdotorg, lol, it doesn’t take much to know that racists, anti-semites and extremists are NOT real Jews!!!

    If you believe that Jews and Muslims are enemies, you are either an anti-semite and Islamophobe or you are a fake Jew who knows nothing about Judaism! Arsehole!!!!!

  128. One last comment from me ever. jtfdotorg, the fact that you would support this KKK racist shit means that if you are Jewish, you are no more a Jew than David Irving, and if you aren’t Jewish, then you should shut up about real Jews, because you are a filthy racist whom no real jew would ever pay any attention to. Youm are no friend of Jews or Israel; only that of the KKK. So, yes, I will judge you. You are not a real Jew, regardless of what you consider your religion to be, and you an an anti-semitic, Islamophpbic, KKK mother fucker! Go fuck yourself and your friends at the KKK!!!

  129. Funny that you should accuse me of being KKK. I’ve had run-ins with the KKK types on this blog. They support Obama because they know he’ll stick it Israel and the Jews, which is all they really care about.

  130. jtfdotorg, if you truly believe that (that Obama will ‘stick it to Israel and the Jews’) then you are a bigger idiot than I thought! lol, can you get any dumber? Anyway, the fact that you would support a site like this, shows that you ARE a member of the KKK. You think that Jews and Muslims are enemies and that whether or not Obama is Muslim should matter to Jews? You think that it is acceptable to use Holocaust terms to describe non-Jews who oppose Obama put of pure racism? You think that Obama is out to to get Jews and Israel? You think it’s okay to describe Jews who support Obama as self-hating Jews or fake Jews? You think that it’s okay to create a site like this?

    Well, you are either an Islamophobic anti-semite who is NO friend of Jews or Israel and is a member of the KKK, or you are a racist and dumb ‘Jew’ who knows nothing about your religion and is as much of a Jew as David Irving. You’re a psychopath and an abomination! Go fuck yourself!

  131. jtfdotorg, I just saw that you wrote one of the articles. Yes, you are a pshychopathic, Islamophobic, anti-semitic fake Jew who doesn’t know the first thing about Judaism, Israel and what is good for Jews and Israel.

    Nobody ‘knows’ that Obama will stick it to Israel and the Jews, because he won’t and he hasn’t. But then you only want him to stick it to Muslims and the Palestinians; well, he aint going to do that either. In fact, he’s not going to stick it to anyone.

    You are a repulsive KKK piece of Islamophobic and anti-Semitic shit who is as Jewish as David Irving or Jews for Jesus. You are an abomination, you give real Jews a bad name, and it is people like you who deserve to rot in the worst of hells. From a real Jew to a fake, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic ‘Jew’ who doesn’t know anything about Judaism, Israel, the best interests of either Jews or Israel and Obama’s views on anything, you are going to burn in hell for being such a filthy and disgusting extremist!!!!! GO FUCK YOURSELF YOU KKK NAZI WASTE OF OXYGEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  132. You say that you’ve had ‘run-ins’ with the KKK types. What you mean is that you’ve men some of your fellow KKK friends.

  133. thank you for the work you do. Obama is bad for Jews, Israel and America. In fact, he’s bad for the world..but thats besides the point..

  134. To the proprietor of Jews Against Obama,

    Good morning. My name is Jack Silverstein – I am a Chicago-based writer and the founder of readjack.com and Keylog Books (and, I guess I should say, a fellow Jew). This March we published Our President, my first book, a non-fiction novella that gives readers a ground-level view of Obama’s inauguration and the election night celebration at Grant Park. The book also features opinion columns from 2006 to 2009, an interview with American activist Michael Swiryn, and a foreword by south-sider and ESPN columnist Scoop Jackson.

    I am contacting you today because we are looking for reviews from all Obama-related bloggers! (Incidentally, when I saw the title of your blog, I flipped: “Jews against Obama! How can this guy not review my book? Gotta get him.”) Pro or con, it’s all good. If you are interested, I will send along links to articles published prior to the book’s publication, along with PDFs of the book-only material.

    For more questions, you can contact me at jack@readjack.com, or my publicist Katie Z Holland at katie.z@readjack.com.

    Best,
    Jack Silverstein

  135. TY Mr. Silverstein, I will check it out.

  136. I think that a major step in the right direction would be for Jews Against Obama and JTF to stop calling Obama “President”:
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/17/there-is-no-president-obama/

  137. Hi, and thank you, we call him Barack HUSSEIN Osama.

    Here is one of my vids:

  138. You are very welcome. Obama must be ARRESTED,yesterday. “Czars” are illegal under the US Constitution. Even if he were born in Hawaii (which is not technically a State) he would still be disqualified. Obama,Sr. was a Brit.
    Obama could not even be naturalized because his mother did not meet the citizenship requirements herself. Traitors come in all races. Obama is part white,part black. I am white so I can criticize his white part and not be “racist”. His Black and Arab parts cannot be separated from his white part. Obama would still be a traitor if he were all white. Not because of his race but because of his actions. Obama faces the death penalty because Obama is a traitor and a fraud. Nancy Pelosi is an accomplice. Freedom is not free. One thing more. Obama is not entitled to the protocol and protections outlined in the Impeachment process for a bona-fides President. A Senate vote could keep a fake president in office. Only a real president can be Impeached. Obama must be arrested and tried in the US District Court for DC and NOT by the Senate or the Chief Justice. Obama is NOT the President and never was. Obama must be tried like any other private citizen,for treason and for fraud. If convicted the death penalty is appropriate.
    See 18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381

    Shalom and L’Chaim

    Long live Israel!

  139. TMJ,
    BTW, I sent that wonderfully done video to Mr. Netanyahu.

  140. Kol tov :D

    I very much agree, Mr. Laity, even if Obama was ‘all’ white, he would still be a traitor.
    I’m sure that Mr. Natanyahu has seen my vids, believe me… lol. I did one on the Flotilla, “Jews just wanna have guns” “Good Golly Israeli” etc..
    Obama is SO a fake!
    I put my own B.C. on my personal website:
    http://themadjewess.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/here-is-my-long-form-birth-certificate-where-is-yours-obama/

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s